The History Of Disputed Elections In The United States

In the democratic system of the United States, elections are the backbone of the political process. Every four years, Americans head to the polls to choose their President, members of Congress, and other representatives. While most elections run smoothly and are accepted by the public, there have been instances throughout history where disputes arise, casting a cloud of uncertainty over the outcome.

The Controversial Election of 1800

The election of 1800 was one of the most contentious in American history. It pitted President John Adams, a Federalist, against his Vice President Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. The campaign was marked by intense personal attacks and vicious partisanship.

Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States

by Edward Foley (Illustrated Edition, Kindle Edition)

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	45520 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	492 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

When the electoral votes were eventually counted, Jefferson and his running mate Aaron Burr ended up with an equal number of votes. This led to a tie in the Electoral College, and the decision was then thrown to the House of Representatives to choose the President.

After several rounds of voting, Thomas Jefferson was finally elected as President. This election highlighted the flaws in the electoral system and ultimately led to the ratification of the 12th Amendment, which refined the procedure for choosing the President and Vice President.

The Infamous "Hanging Chad" Election of 2000

The 2000 presidential election between Al Gore and George W. Bush will forever be remembered for the controversy surrounding the "hanging chads" and the state of Florida. The election came down to a razor-thin margin in the state's popular vote, triggering an automatic recount.

The method of counting ballots in Florida, using punch-card voting machines, led to a disputed process. Tens of thousands of ballots were invalidated due to hanging chads, where the punched-out piece of paper was still partially attached. This raised concerns about voter intent and whether certain votes were incorrectly discarded.

After a series of legal battles that reached the Supreme Court, George W. Bush was declared the winner and became the 43rd President of the United States. This election highlighted the importance of clear and accurate voting systems, leading to significant reforms and the adoption of more reliable voting machines.

The Recent Controversial Election of 2020

The most recent disputed election in the United States occurred in 2020, with Joe Biden and Donald Trump as the main contenders. The election took place during a highly polarized political climate, further fueling speculation about the legitimacy of the results.

Claims of voter fraud, irregularities in the vote-counting process, and legal challenges emerged from different sides. Social media played a significant role in amplifying these claims and spreading misinformation.

Despite the controversies, numerous court rulings and investigations confirmed the integrity of the election. Joe Biden was inaugurated as the 46th President of the United States, and the peaceful transition of power took place.

Disputed elections have been a part of United States history, highlighting the significance and complexity of the democratic process. While these controversies may shake public trust and raise concerns, they also serve as opportunities for improvement.

Through the lessons learned from each disputed election, the United States has refined its voting procedures, implemented reforms, and strived to ensure the integrity of its elections. It is through these challenges that the democratic system evolves and adapts to meet the needs of its citizens.

Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States

by Edward Foley (Illustrated Edition, Kindle Edition)

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	45520 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	492 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

The 2000 presidential race resulted in the highest-profile ballot battle in over a century. But it is far from the only American election determined by a handful of votes and marred by claims of fraud. Since the founding of the nation, violence frequently erupted as the votes were being counted, and more than a few elections produced manifestly unfair results. Despite America's claim to be the world's greatest democracy, its adherence to the basic tenets of democratic elections-the ability to count ballots accurately and fairly even when the stakes are high-has always been shaky. A rigged gubernatorial election in New York in 1792 nearly ended in calls for another revolution, and an 1899 gubernatorial race even resulted in an assassination. Though acts of violence have decreased in frequency over the past century, fairness and accuracy in ballot counting nonetheless remains a basic problem in American political life.

In Ballot Battles, Edward Foley presents a sweeping history of election controversies in the United States, tracing how their evolution generated legal precedents that ultimately transformed how we determine who wins and who loses. While weaving a narrative spanning over two centuries, Foley repeatedly returns to an originating event: because the Founding Fathers despised parties and never envisioned the emergence of a party system, they wrote a constitution that did not provide clear solutions for high-stakes and highly-contested elections in which two parties could pool resources against one another. Moreover, in the American political system that actually developed, politicians are beholden to the parties which they represent - and elected officials have typically had an outsized say in determining the outcomes of extremely close elections that involve recounts. This underlying structural problem, more than anything else, explains why intense ballot battles that leave one side feeling aggrieved will continue to occur for the foreseeable future.

American democracy has improved dramatically over the last two centuries. But the same cannot be said for the ways in which we determine who wins the very close races. From the founding until today, there has been little progress toward fixing the problem. Indeed, supporters of John Jay in 1792 and opponents of Lyndon Johnson in the 1948 Texas Senate race would find it easy to commiserate with Al Gore after the 2000 election. Ballot Battles is not only the first full chronicle of contested elections in the US. It also provides a powerful explanation of why the American election system has been-and remains-so ineffective at deciding the tightest races in a way that all sides will agree is fair.